We wrote this essay to stimulate IS specialists' efforts to become mor
e effective - and more credible - agents of organizational change. The
essay describes what we believe to be a view of the IS specialists' c
hange-agent role that is very commonly held by IS specialists. We beli
eve that this role, while well-intentioned and supported by structural
conditions in IS work, often has negative consequences for organizati
ons and for the credibility of IS specialists. Further, it does not fi
t the emerging structural condition, of IS. We describe two alternativ
e models of what it means to be a change agent, their potential conseq
uences, and the structural conditions that support or inhibit behavior
in that role. We conclude that increased behavioral flexibility of IS
specialists - the ability to switch roles in different circumstances
- would improve organizational effectiveness and IS specialist credibi
lity. Finally, we discuss the implications of our analysis for researc
h, teaching, and practice.