New chemotherapies are urgently needed for the parasitic infections of
animals and for the tropical diseases of man. Rational molecular desi
gn approaches to attempt to discover such products require a massive i
nvestment of resources up-front of actual chemical synthesis. However,
such investment is justified, since chemical synthesis itself is high
ly resource-consuming. The fact that few targets have yet been validat
ed to justify a rational approach is an argument only to get on and va
lidate more. Not all the components of molecular design can yet be don
e totally rationally, but this is not an argument against applying thi
s approach where it is possible. Absence of a successful track record
is inevitable for any newly emerging technology. It is too early to dr
aw conclusions about the relative costs of rational design versus empi
rical synthesis, since the former is only now beginning to become real
ity and the latter is in the middle of a (combinatorial) revolution. S
imilarly, it is too soon to predict with certainty which of these two
approaches will prevail in the long run. However, they lend themselves
to parallel tracks, so both may well continue for the foreseeable fut
ure. Current concerns about who would develop successful discoveries a
re not reasons for stopping discovery research. Indeed, a string of pu
tative products held at the discovery/development interface would be u
seful ammunition to those trying to develop partnerships such as a Tro
pical Diseases R&D Alliance aimed at carrying out such work and sharin
g costs.