EMBRYO IMPLANTATION DURING MENSTRUATION IN THE ABSENCE OF ADEQUATE ESTRADIOL AND PROGESTERONE SUPPORT, WITH SUBSEQUENT NORMAL RESPONSE TO OVULATION INDUCTION AND SUPERFETATION

Citation
Wp. Dmowski et al., EMBRYO IMPLANTATION DURING MENSTRUATION IN THE ABSENCE OF ADEQUATE ESTRADIOL AND PROGESTERONE SUPPORT, WITH SUBSEQUENT NORMAL RESPONSE TO OVULATION INDUCTION AND SUPERFETATION, Fertility and sterility, 68(3), 1997, pp. 538-541
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00150282
Volume
68
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
538 - 541
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(1997)68:3<538:EIDMIT>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Objective: To report an unusual case of embryo implantation and superf etation.Design: Retrospective case analysis. Setting: Oak Brook Fertil ity Center. Patient(s): A 41-year-old woman underwent two consecutive ovarian stimulation cycles interrupted by a normal menstrual period. O vulation and implantation occurred during both cycles. The first embry o conceived developed normally until term; the second failed to develo p. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Retrospective analy sis of stored blood samples for serum E-2, P, and beta-hCG levels. Res ult(s): Rising beta-hCG levels during menstruation indicated normal em bryonic implantation in the absence of adequate E-2 and P support, Dur ing subsequent ovarian stimulation, there was a normal follicular and E-2 response and normal ovulation in spite of the ongoing pregnancy. T he second embryo, conceived during the second cycle of stimulation, im planted but failed to develop. Conclusion(s): This unusual case indica tes that E-2, P, and endometrial thickness requirements for successful implantation may not always be as critical as postulated previously. The absence of a decidual response might have facilitated superfetatio n. (C) 1997 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.