Wd. Montgomery et al., WHAT IN-VITRO METHOD SHOULD SURGEONS USE TO EVALUATE THE CLINICAL BEHAVIOR OF ARTERIAL BYPASS CONDUITS, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 12(3), 1997, pp. 436-442
Surgeons have traditionally relied on ring preparations to predict how
arterial bypass conduits will behave in the postoperative circulation
. Objective: This study compared pharmacologic [norepinephrine (NE) ch
allenge] and physiologic [arterial preload] responses of gastroepiploi
c (GEA) and internal thoracic (ITA) arteries in a standard static ring
preparation and a dynamic perfusion system. Methods: Six GEAs (1.0-1.
5 mm dia.) and six ITAs (1.5-2.0 mm dia.) 11 cm long were harvested fr
om adult pigs and mounted on a computer controlled perfusion system. i
nflow pressure was set at 80 mmHg and outflow resistance was adjusted
to simulate high (80-90 ml/min) and low (15-20 ml/min) flow demands. N
E response (10(-9)-10(-5) M) was measured under low flow conditions an
d at high flow conditions when distal arterial pressure (load) was red
uced. NE response (10(-9)-10(-5) M) was also evaluated in arterial rin
gs (ITA N = 6, GEA N = 6) with tensions adjusted to simulate the lends
occurring at low flow (50 mmHg) and high flow (60 mmHg) situations, R
esults: In the static ring preparation, NE response [ED50] was similar
for both GEA and ITA and was not affected by load. The dynamic prepar
ation demonstrated that the GEAs were significantly more responsive to
NE than the ITAs [ED50 high flow: ITA 6.1 +/- 0.3*, GEA 7.2 +/- 0.3*
*, *P < 0.05 versus baseline, **P < 0.05 versus low flow values, ***P
< 0.05 versus ITA]. Furthermore, in the dynamic preparation, NE respo
nse nas profoundly affected by reduced load which occurs under high fl
ow conditions [7.18 +/- 0.3 versus 6.1 +/- 0.3 under high flow and 5.8
+/- 0.1 versus no response under low flow conditions]. Conclusion: St
atic ring preparations do not discern differences between ITA and GEA
susceptibility to spasm and fail to detect the effect of load. The dyn
amic preparation demonstrated significant differences between the GEA
and ITA potential to spasm which is consistent with widespread clinica
l experience. Furthermore a dynamic preparation is highly sensitive to
reduced load which occurs under high how conditions, Although it is m
ore demanding, the dynamic preparation provides superior information t
o the surgeon in predicting the behavior of arterial bypass grafts. (C
) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.