In most settings, a 'public' health service refers to a service which
belongs to the state. The term 'private' is used when health care is d
elivered by individuals and/or institutions not administered by the st
ate. In this paper it is argued that such a distinction, which is base
d on the institutional or administrative identity of the health care p
rovider, is not adequate because it takes for granted that the nature
of this identity automatically determines the nature of the service de
livered to the population. A different frame of classification between
public and private health services is proposed: one which is based on
the purpose the health service pursues and on the outputs it yields.
A set of five operational criteria to distinguish between health servi
ces guided by a public or private purpose is presented. This alternati
ve classification is discussed in relation to a variety of existing si
tuations in sub-Saharan Africa (Mall, Uganda, Zimbabwe). It is hoped t
hat it carl be used as a tool in the hands of the health planner in or
der to bring more rationality in the current altercation between the p
ublic and the private health care sector.