Mediation plays an ever-increasing role in a variety of dispute contex
ts. Once primarily limited to labor or neighborhood conflicts, the med
iation process is currently being used to resolve environmental, perso
nal injury, securities, and bioethics disputes, This movement into new
areas has sparked modifications and innovations in traditional mediat
ion practice. an this Article, Professor Waldman argues that changes i
n mediation practice require a revamping of mediation theory, She argu
es that mediation encompasses three separate, but related, procedural
models that can be distinguished by their divergent treatment of socia
l norms, She terms these models ''norm-generating,'' ''norm-educating,
'' and ''norm-advocating''. In the norm-generating model, the mediator
invites the parties to create the norms which will guide their agreem
ent. In norm-educating mediation, the mediator educates the parties ab
out the social norms implicated by their dispute, but does not suggest
or encourage their adoption. In the norm-advocating model, the mediat
or informs the parties of relevant social norms, and also advocates fo
r their inclusion in the parties' agreement. Professor Waldman suggest
s that recognition of these models will enhance efforts to construct m
eaningful professional standards and clarify, for both practitioners a
nd clients, the different guises mediation assumes in different types
of disputes.