W. Ebert et al., MONITORING OF THERAPY IN INOPERABLE LUNG-CANCER PATIENTS BY MEASUREMENT OF CYFRA-21-1, TPA-M, TPS, CEA, AND NSE, Anticancer research, 17(4B), 1997, pp. 2875-2878
In a series of 381 consecutive patients with lung tumors and benign pu
lmonary diseases, we examined whether tumor markers CYFRA 21-1 (ELA, B
oehringer, Mannheim), TPA-M (IRMA AB Sangtec Medical, Bromma, Sweden),
TPS (IRMA, Beki Diagnostics RS, Bromma Sweden), CEA and NSE ( ELA, Ro
che Basel) have the potential to contribute to clinical decision - mak
ing processes with respect to diagnosis and assessment of response to
therapy. The sensitivity values of the marker tests in NSCLC (CYFRA 21
-1: 44,4% >3,9 ng/ml, TPA-M: 39,4% >200 U/ml, TPS: 13,2% >230 U/ml, CE
A: 37,5% >8,6 ng/ml), in SCLC (NSE: 61,9% >14.0 ng/ml) and in pleural
mesothelioma (CYFRA 21 -1 and TPS: 36,4%) were found to be clearly inf
erior to the yield of standard cytopathological examinations (85 - 98%
) when using the 95% specificity versus the group with benign pu2monal
y disease as cut - off values. Therefore, currently available tumor ma
rkets are of minor value in the primary diagnosis of lung tumors. Afte
r curative surgery (Re) of NSCLC only CYFRA 21-1 levels dropped to the
normal range within one week. The other markers simulated residual tu
mor mass by displaying elevated marker levels after surgery. During th
e monitoring of response to chemo-1 radiotherapy the changes in marker
levels were compared to the clinical assessment according to standard
critieria of the WHO. The criteria defined for marker response were a
65% decrease for a partial response and a 40% increase of the marker
levels for progressive disease. Concordant results were obtained in 59
,4% of the cases for CYFRA 21-1 (TPA-M: 63,3%, TPS: 65,5%, CEA: 54,8%,
NSE: 68,9%). Most discordant results were obtained in tumor remission
due to an insufficient decrease in the markers. Progressive disease w
as most effectively indicated by CYFRA 21-1 in NSCLC 60%) and by NSE i
n SCLC (70.0%). It is concluded that increasing marker levels may cont
ribute to clinical decision making, at least in helping to decide whic
h patients should no longer treated by ineffective and toxic drugs.