HAMAs (human anti mouse antibodies) in serum of patients may be stimul
ated as an immunologic reaction to the application of animal protein.
They are differentiated into heterophilic (species-unspecific) and mou
se-specific anti-isotypic (often IgG(1)) or-idiotypic antibodies as we
ll as according to the human immunoglobulin type (IgG or IgM). Besides
infrequent clinically immunologic side effects (anaphylactic reaction
), their influence on tumor marker measurements predominates in the fo
llow-up of tumor patients by the possible impairment of newly applied
monoclonal antibodies. The detection of HAMAs is performed on suspicio
n of a tumor by self-mane or commercial tests, however, there is no co
nsensus standardization of tests, standards and controls. Experiences
are repelled herein on the occurrence of heterophilic antibodies, reas
ons of suspicion, detection and removal comparative determination of H
AMAs by two commercially available tests (ImmunoSTRIP HAMA, Enzygnost)
and HAMA induction in patients following immunoscintigraphy (OC-125,
n=27). Besides the rare appearance of HAMAs in patients without pretre
atment or following biologic therapy i.v. application of monoclonal an
tibodies for diagnosis (immunoscintigraphy) or therapy represents the
most frequent reason for HAMA development that should always be ruled
out in case of anamnestic indication and clinically unexplained tumor
marker changes.