M. Martin et al., ANALYTICAL AND CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF A METHOD TO QUANTIFY BONE ALKALINE-PHOSPHATASE, A MARKER OF OSTEOBLASTIC ACTIVITY, Anticancer research, 17(4B), 1997, pp. 3167-3170
An immunoradiometric assay (IRMA), involving specific monoclonal antib
odies (Ostase, Hybritech) and agarose electrophoresis (Isopal, Beckman
), two methods for quantification of serum bone alkaline phosphatase (
ALP), a marker for osteoblastic activity, were analytically and clinic
ally compared in 293 patients: 79 with end-stage renal failure treated
with hemodialysis and 214 with malignant disease. Acceptable within-a
ssay precision was obtained for the IRMA method: 82.5% of the duplicat
e determinations had a coefficient of variation (CV) <5%. Curve fittin
g characteristics were bad and the sensitivity was better than the one
mentioned by the manufacturer. Overall correlation between the two me
thods was good (r=0.92), except (a) for low values of bone ALP and (bi
in some samples with high total liver ALP activity. Low bone ALP dete
rmined with the IRMA (<5 mu g/L) was confirmed by electrophoresis (<22
U/L), but ALP activity determined by electrophoresis to be low (<22 U
/L) was not correlated with the IRMA results. After standardizing our
results by computing values for bone ALP, Delta z (= z(ostase) - z(ele
ctrophoresis)) was significant correlated with liver ALP activity (r=0
.73, P<0.0001). We conclude that the IRMA for quantifying bone ALP is
acceptable. However, when high values for bone ALP are found with the
Ostase method confirmation by electrophoresis remains mandatory to rul
e out cross-reactivity with high amounts of liver ALP.