Ma. West et al., THE ROLE OF ADP-RIBOSYLATION FACTOR AND PHOSPHOLIPASE-D IN ADAPTER RECRUITMENT, The Journal of cell biology, 138(6), 1997, pp. 1239-1254
AP-1 and AP-2 adaptors are recruited onto the TGN and plasma membrane,
respectively. GTP gamma S stimulates the recruitment of AP-1 onto the
TGN but causes AP-2 to bind to an endosomal compartment (Seaman, M.N.
J., C.L. Ball, and M.S. Robinson. 1993.J. Cell Biol. 123:1093-1105). W
e have used subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting, as
well, as immunofluorescence and immunogold electron microscopy, to in
vestigate both the recruitment of AP-2 adaptors onto the plasma membra
ne and their targeting to endosomes, and we have also examined the rec
ruitment of AP-1 under the same conditions. Two lines of evidence indi
cate that the GTP gamma S-induced targeting of AP-2 to endosomes is me
diated by ADP-ribosylation factor-1 (ARF1). First, GTP gamma S loses i
ts effect when added to ARF-depleted cytosol, but this effect is resto
red by the addition of recombinant myristoylated ARF1. Second, adding
constitutively active Q71L ARF1 to the cytosol has the same effect as
adding GTP gamma S. The endosomal membranes that recruit AP-2 adaptors
have little ARF1 or any of the other ARFs associated with them, sugge
sting that ARF may be acting catalytically. The ARFs have been shown t
o activate phospholipase D (PLD), and we find that addition of exogeno
us PLD has the same effect as GTP gamma S or Q71L ARF1. Neomycin, whic
h inhibits endogenous PLD by binding to its cofactor phosphatidylinosi
tol 4,5-bisphosphate, prevents the recruitment of AP-2 not only onto e
ndosomes but also onto the plasma membrane, suggesting that both event
s are mediated by PLD. Surprisingly, however, neither PLD nor neomycin
has any effect on the recruitment of AP-1 adaptors onto the TGN, even
though AP-1 recruitment is ARF mediated. These results indicate that
different mechanisms are used for the recruitment of AP-1 and AP-2.