K. Stronks et al., CULTURAL, MATERIAL, AND PSYCHOSOCIAL CORRELATES OF THE SOCIOECONOMIC GRADIENT IN SMOKING-BEHAVIOR AMONG ADULTS, Preventive medicine, 26(5), 1997, pp. 754-766
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Medicine, General & Internal
Background. The aim was to identify the correlates of educational diff
erences in smoking among adults. Methods. We used data from the baseli
ne of a Dutch longitudinal study, relating to a population of 2,462 re
spondents, ages 25-74. Logistic regression was used to assess the educ
ational gradient in smoking. Current smokers were compared with former
and never smokers, respectively. Results. The risk of being a current
smoker compared with being a former/never smoker was higher among low
er educational groups. For example, the odds of being a current smoker
compared with never smoker among persons in the lowest level was more
than five times as high as that for persons in the highest level. A s
ubstantial part (20-40%) of the increased risk of being a smoker among
lower groups appeared to be associated with adverse material conditio
ns. The financial situation especially accounted for that effect. One
of the cultural factors, i.e., locus of control, was found to account
for approximately 30% of the educational gradient in the case in which
smokers were compared with former smokers. Psychosocial factors, i.e.
, neuroticism and coping styles, accounted for less of the gradient in
smoking than cultural and material factors. Conclusions. On the basis
of the results, we hypothesize that both cultural and material factor
s contribute to the higher smoking rates among lower socioeconomic gro
ups. Psychosocial factors seem to be less important. If our results ar
e confirmed in more powerful studies, this would indicate, first, that
possibilities for a reduction of smoking differences may be found in
tailoring smoking cessation programs to the more externally oriented l
ocus of control and the coping styles that are common among lower educ
ational groups, and second, that a reduction of smoking differences ma
y follow from an improvement of the material living conditions of lowe
r socioeconomic groups. (C) 1997 Academic Press.