AN EVALUATION OF THE ANXIOLYTIC SC 48,274 IN GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER (GAD)

Citation
Nr. Cutler et al., AN EVALUATION OF THE ANXIOLYTIC SC 48,274 IN GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER (GAD), Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 18(4), 1994, pp. 685-694
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Psychiatry
ISSN journal
02785846
Volume
18
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
685 - 694
Database
ISI
SICI code
0278-5846(1994)18:4<685:AEOTAS>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
1. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of two dosages of SC 48,274 (1 mg and 25 mg) as compared to placebo in subjects with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). 2. This was a randomized, double-b lind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study which was part of one o f three large multicenter trials which evaluated a total of 5 doses of SC 48,274 (.25, 1, 5, 25, and 100 mg bid). Following a 7-day placebo baseline period, patients entered 4 weeks of double-blind treatment an d a 7-day placebo follow-up period. 3. Efficacy was assessed weekly th roughout the study with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and at treatment endpoint with the Covi Anxiety Scale, Raskin Depression Scale and Hamilton Depression Ra ting Scale (HAM-D). A diagnosis of GAD according to DSM-III-R criteria (with the exception that a GAD minimum duration of 3 months was allow ed), a HAM-A score greater-than-or-equal-to 20 (anxious mood and tensi on items greater-than-or-equal-to 2), HAM-D less than HAM-A, Covi Anxi ety Score greater-than-or-equal-to 8, Raskin Depression Scale less tha n the Covi Anxiety, and age of 18 to 65 years were necessary for inclu sion in the study. 4. Patients received one of two dosages of SC 48,27 4, either 1 mg (n = 28), 25 mg (n = 9), or placebo (n = 28) bid, durin g the 4-week randomized portion of the trial. 5. Mean changes from bas eline in HAM-A scores for the 1 mg, 25 mg, and placebo groups after 4 weeks treatment were -5.1, -4.2, and -1.9, respectively. Changes were significant for the 1 mg group vs. placebo (F = 8.93, p = 0.004), but not for the 25 mg group (F = 2.26, p = 0.138). 6. CGI severity of illn ess scores were also significant for the 1 mg group versus placebo at the end of treatment (X2 = 3.8, p = 0.05), but not for the 25mg group (X2 = 0.90, p = 0.343). Neither group showed significant CGI improveme nt scores by end of treatment. 7. The most frequent adverse events ass ociated with the study drug (n = 37) were headache (n = 7), nausea (n = 3), palpitations (n = 4) and chest pains (n = 2). There was, however , no apparent pattern of adverse events distinguishing SC 48,274 from placebo.