Whether male sexual orientation is best represented by discrete catego
ries or by a continuum has been the focus of much debate. These altern
atives were compared in an analysis of 1,138 men's scores on the Minne
sota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Masculinity-Femininity Scale,
an established correlate of male sexual orientation. Mixtures of 2 or
3 latent distributions did not fit the observed distribution of score
s better than a single normal distribution, suggesting that the latent
variable underlying male sexual orientation is not discrete. Addition
al taxometric analyses provided convergent support for continuity. The
findings were inconsistent with accounts of male sexual orientation t
hat invoke single preponderant causes, whether genetic or environmenta
l, and call some forms of taxonomic theorizing about sexual orientatio
n into question.