We examine the fit between the ownership data provided by four surroga
te databases and the data collected from proxy statements. We discover
an unambiguous pecking order among the surrogates relative to the ben
chmark ownership statistics of corporate proxy statements. Corporate T
ext is first, followed in descending order by Compact Disclosure, Valu
e Line, and Spectrum. Further tests show that reporting discrepancies
in the Value Line and Spectrum databases could affect economic inferen
ces drawn from regressions using their ownership data. A field guide d
escribing each data source's reporting conventions, formats, and strat
egies for data aggregation may be downloaded from the Journal of Finan
cial and Quantitative Analysis' web site (http://weber.u.washington.ed
u/(similar to)jfqa/hold/andepdx.pdf).