N. Plotton et al., E-TEST FOR DETERMINING ANTIMICROBIAL SUSC EPTIBILITIES OF STAPHYLOCOCCI AND ENTEROCOCCI TO GLYCOPEPTIDES, Pathologie et biologie, 42(5), 1994, pp. 468-470
E-test was evaluated by comparison with the reference agar dilution me
thod. on 15 enterococcci and 15 staphylococci with variable resistance
to glycopeptides and isolated from clinical samples: 15 enterococci w
ith 3 glycopeptide-resistant (2 E. facalis and 1 E. faecium), 1 glycop
eptide intermediate E. gallinarum and 11 glycopeptide-sensible E. faec
alis; 15 staphylococci with 4 teicoplanine-resistant (1 S. aureus, 1 S
. epidermidis and 2 S. hominis), 3 teicoplanin-intermediate (1 S. epid
ermidis, 2 S. haemolyticus) and 8 teicoplanin sensible strains (6 S. a
ureus, 1 S. epidermidis and 1 S. hominis). Repetability (10 determinat
ions by strain) and exactitude were tested for all strains. Our data s
hows very good results for repetability and exactitude with the refere
nce method except in the case of coagulase negative staphylococci and
teicoplanin. Some technical problems appear in our experience: for sta
phylococci, a 48 h incubation is necessary to detect teicoplanin-inter
mediate strains but 24 h is sufficient for enterococci. E-test is expe
nsive, require a strict methodology, but is a good method to detect gl
ycopeptide resistance for staphylococci and enterococci except for coa
gulase negative staphylococci and teicoplanine.