Ct. Postma et al., MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY HAS A HIGH-RELIABILITY IN THE DETECTION OF RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS, American journal of hypertension, 10(9), 1997, pp. 957-963
In this prospective study we examined the value of magnetic resonance
angiography (MRA) in the imaging of the proximal renal arteries, with
the main aim of detecting renal arterial stenosis, as compared with in
traarterial digital subtraction angiography. The study was done among
a group of 38 hypertensive patients seen in the outpatient department
of the department of medicine of our university hospital. In all patie
nts a magnetic resonance angiography and an intraarterial subtraction
angiography of the renal arteries was made, and the outcomes of the in
vestigations were compared. Clinical and biochemical data of the patie
nts also were analyzed in relation to the presence or absence of a ste
nosis. In one patient, MRA resulted in technical failure because of un
suspected claustrophobia. Of the remaining 37 patients, 14 had renal a
rtery stenosis. Of 12 patients in whom the stenoses were >50% of lumin
al surface on intraarterial digital subtraction angiography, eight wer
e unilateral and four bilateral. All these stenoses were recognized by
magnetic resonance angiography. There was also one false positive res
ult by magnetic resonance. Thus, for the identification of stenoses >5
0%, magnetic resonance has a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of
96%. Of the 12 accessory renal arteries seen on digital subtraction an
giography, only three were identified by magnetic resonance angiograph
y. We conclude that magnetic resonance angiography has great accuracy
in depicting the main renal arteries and detecting clinically signific
ant renal artery stenosis; however, the identification of accessory re
nal arteries is suboptimal and should be improved. (C) 1997 American J
ournal of Hypertension, Ltd.