HIGH-SCHOOL SIZE - WHICH WORKS BEST AND FOR WHOM

Authors
Citation
Ve. Lee et Jb. Smith, HIGH-SCHOOL SIZE - WHICH WORKS BEST AND FOR WHOM, Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 19(3), 1997, pp. 205-227
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Education & Educational Research
ISSN journal
01623737
Volume
19
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
205 - 227
Database
ISI
SICI code
0162-3737(1997)19:3<205:HS-WWB>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The study described in this article investigates the relationship betw een high school size and student learning. We used three waves of data from NELS:88 and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) methods to examin e how students' achievement growth in two subjects (reading and mathem atics) over the high school years is influenced by the size of the hig h school they attend. Three research questions guided the study: (a) W hich size high school is most effective for students' learning?, (b) I n which size high school is learning most equitably distributed?, and (c) Are size effects consistent across high schools defined by their s ocial compositions? Results suggest that the ideal high school, define d in terms of effectiveness (i.e., learning), enrolls between 600 and 900 students. In schools smaller than this, students learn less; those in large high schools (especially over 2,100) learn considerably less . Learning is more equitable in very small schools, with equity define d by the relationship between learning and student socioeconomic statu s (SES). An important finding from the study is that the influence of school size on learning is different in schools that enroll students o f varying SES and in schools with differing proportions of minorities. Enrollment size has a stronger effect on learning in schools with low er-SES students and also in schools with high concentrations of minori ty students. Implications for educational policy are discussed.