THE USE OF TIME DURING LEXICAL PROCESSING AND SEGMENTATION - A REVIEW

Authors
Citation
Sl. Mattys, THE USE OF TIME DURING LEXICAL PROCESSING AND SEGMENTATION - A REVIEW, Psychonomic bulletin & review, 4(3), 1997, pp. 310-329
Citations number
193
Categorie Soggetti
Psychologym Experimental","Psychology, Experimental
ISSN journal
10699384
Volume
4
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
310 - 329
Database
ISI
SICI code
1069-9384(1997)4:3<310:TUOTDL>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Speech, by its very nature, is a time-based phenomenon. Speech sounds are temporally distributed with the presentation of one sound roughly conditioned by the fading of the previous one. In this review, three c lasses of models are discussed with respect to the sequential nature o f speech. It is argued that the three resulting conceptions of time ar e linked to the type of segmentation process proposed by these models to deal with speech continuity. In the first one, lexical activation i s viewed as perfectly synchronized with the temporal deployment of spe ech. This type of model corresponds to the traditional left-to-right ( proactive) account of lexical processing. Because serious segmentation problems exist for such an approach (e.g,, car and card are embedded in cardinal), the second type of model treats word recognition as the result of a mechanism that sometimes delays commitment on word identit y beyond word offset, Lexical activation, instead of shadowing the unf olding of time, lags behind it until an unambiguous decision can be ma de. The temporarily unprocessed information is stored in a memory buff er. In the third approach, a prosodic cue (lexical stress) contributes actively to speech. segmentation and lexical processing. Every stress ed syllable encountered in the signal is postulated as a word onset an d thus constitutes the starting point of lexical activation, However, with non-initial-stressed words, retroactive procedures going ''back i n time'' must be used, Finally, the use of time (including proactive, delayed, and retroactive procedures) is discussed in light of cross-li nguistic phonological differences.