Speech, by its very nature, is a time-based phenomenon. Speech sounds
are temporally distributed with the presentation of one sound roughly
conditioned by the fading of the previous one. In this review, three c
lasses of models are discussed with respect to the sequential nature o
f speech. It is argued that the three resulting conceptions of time ar
e linked to the type of segmentation process proposed by these models
to deal with speech continuity. In the first one, lexical activation i
s viewed as perfectly synchronized with the temporal deployment of spe
ech. This type of model corresponds to the traditional left-to-right (
proactive) account of lexical processing. Because serious segmentation
problems exist for such an approach (e.g,, car and card are embedded
in cardinal), the second type of model treats word recognition as the
result of a mechanism that sometimes delays commitment on word identit
y beyond word offset, Lexical activation, instead of shadowing the unf
olding of time, lags behind it until an unambiguous decision can be ma
de. The temporarily unprocessed information is stored in a memory buff
er. In the third approach, a prosodic cue (lexical stress) contributes
actively to speech. segmentation and lexical processing. Every stress
ed syllable encountered in the signal is postulated as a word onset an
d thus constitutes the starting point of lexical activation, However,
with non-initial-stressed words, retroactive procedures going ''back i
n time'' must be used, Finally, the use of time (including proactive,
delayed, and retroactive procedures) is discussed in light of cross-li
nguistic phonological differences.