THE USE OF NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT AND CONTINGENT RESTRAINT TO REDUCE PHYSICAL AGGRESSION AND SELF-INJURIOUS-BEHAVIOR IN A TRAUMATICALLY BRAIN-INJURED ADULT
Cs. Persel et al., THE USE OF NONCONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT AND CONTINGENT RESTRAINT TO REDUCE PHYSICAL AGGRESSION AND SELF-INJURIOUS-BEHAVIOR IN A TRAUMATICALLY BRAIN-INJURED ADULT, Brain injury, 11(10), 1997, pp. 751-760
Many different intervention programmes for reducing undesirable behavi
our with people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been investigat
ed in recent years. The purpose of this study was to examine the poten
tial of using noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) in combination with co
ntingent restraint to reduce severe behaviour. The subject (E.L.) was
a 40-year-old male with TBI admitted to a rehabilitation long-term car
e programme. E.L. had a history of physical aggression (PA) and self-i
njurious behaviour (SIB). Assessment conditions included a descriptive
analysis, response scatterplot and Self-Injury Trauma (SIT) Scale. At
tention was identified as the maintaining positive reinforcement for P
A and SIE. Treatment conditions were compared using a reversal (ABAB)
design. Attention (NCR) was delivered on a fixed-time schedule that wa
s not dependent on the subject's behaviour. Contingent restraint was a
pplied when E.L. exhibited PA or SIE that was dangerous to himself or
others. During treatment, PA occurred over 4 times less often and SIE
over 2.5 times less often. Results demonstrated that PA and SIE were s
ensitive to NCR. NCR can be an effective procedure for reducing severe
behaviour maintained by socially-mediated positive reinforcement.