The author examines the question of why labor in the former Soviet Uni
on has remained so quiet during this tumultous period. He conducts a m
ost similar case study of coal miners, who have struck and organized m
ilitant trade unions, and of steelworkers in the same communities, who
have not. To explain the lack of strike activity, the concept of mutu
al dependence is developed, whereby the enterprise is dependent on wor
kers in a labor-short economy and workers in turn have been dependent
on the enterprise for the provision of goods and services in short sup
ply. The provision of a high level of such goods and services through
the workplace was found to prevent independent worker activity in stee
l mills and certain coal mines. Implications are drawn for theories of
collective action and the study of the former Soviet Union and its ec
onomic and political transformation.