Procedural discourse is a monologue discourse task concerned with expl
aining to a listener how a particular activity is carried out. The stu
dy reported here is part of a series of investigations into discourse
abilities following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of th
is study was to compare the procedural discourse skills of a group of
26 TBI speakers, with those of two demographically distinct control gr
oups. The first control group comprised 26 non-TBI orthopaedic patient
s, and the second control group comprised 26 university students. Thes
e control groups were selected because of the hypothesis that premorbi
d demographic factors could influence sociolinguistic skills, and henc
e performance on a procedural discourse task. The TBI group was system
atically compared with the control groups on content, productivity, an
d pragmatic measures. They were not significantly different from ortho
paedic patients on measures relating to content and productivity; howe
ver, they did differ significantly from the university students on the
se measures. The TBI group differed significantly from both control gr
oups with respect to the production of pragmatic errors, and these wer
e predominantly concerned with information transfer. The results are d
iscussed in relation to issues in selecting control groups for discour
se research following TBI, together with the clinical implications of
the findings.