Bp. Korge et al., LORICRIN MUTATION IN VOHWINKELS KERATODERMA IS UNIQUE TO THE VARIANT WITH ICHTHYOSIS, Journal of investigative dermatology, 109(4), 1997, pp. 604-610
A mutation in the glycine-rich cornified envelope protein loricrin has
recently been reported in Vohwinkel's keratoderma (honeycomb keratode
rma with pseudoainhum), in a pedigree amongst whom ichthyosis was also
a feature. We have studied two further families with Vohwinkel's kera
toderma for evidence of loricrin mutations. Our first family (VK1) als
o had ichthyosis but not deafness. In lesional and nonlesional skin, g
ranular and transitional cell layers were increased. In immunoelectron
-microscopic studies cornified envelopes were abnormally thin and were
labeled densely by anti-involucrin antibodies, but only sparsely by a
ntiloricrin antibodies; however, abnormal intranuclear granules seen i
n granular and cornified layer cells were labeled by antibodies to bot
h C- and N-terminal loricrin. Microsatellite markers in VK1 supported
linkage to the loricrin locus in the epidermal differentiation complex
at 1q21 (Zmax = 2.48). The loricrin gene was sequenced, identifying a
heterozygous mutation as previously reported: a G insertion producing
a frameshift after codon 231 and an abnormal C-terminal peptide lacki
ng residues necessary for cross-linking. In our second family (VK2), a
ffected members had sensorineural deafness but not ichthyosis. Immunoe
lectron-microscopic studies showed normal loricrin distribution, and a
ssuming complete penetrance, linkage to 1q21 was excluded. Vohwinkel's
keratoderma is thus clinically and genetically heterogeneous. Only th
e variant with ichthyosis appears to be due to loricrin mutation. As t
he arginine-rich domain in C-terminal loricrin caused by the frameshif
t contains several potential bipartite nuclear localization signals, w
e suggest that the intranuclear accumulation of loricrin in VK1 is due
to these motifs, and may be unique to insertional mutation.