Jhs. Macquaker et al., THE ROLE OF IRON IN MUDSTONE DIAGENESIS - COMPARISON OF KIMMERIDGE CLAY FORMATION MUDSTONES FROM ONSHORE AND OFFSHORE (UKCS) LOCALITIES, Journal of sedimentary research, 67(5), 1997, pp. 871-878
Siliciclastic muds and mudstones commonly contain 5% iron, At depositi
on, most of this iron is in the oxidized form, Fe-III, whereas in anci
ent mudstones it is predominantly in the reduced form, Fe-II. In most
fine-grained siliciclastic sediments iron reduction is an important pr
ocess during burial diagenesis. A combination of geochemical and petro
logic techniques has been applied to organic-rich mudstones of the Kim
meridge Clay Formation to investigate this valence change, These sedim
ents were collected from a variety of depositional (shallow shelf to d
eep graben) environments and diagenetic (0.5-4.5 km burial) settings,
and our analyses have shown that significant Fe-III survives burial to
depths of the order of 4 km, At these depths Fe-III is located (toget
her with Al) in dioctahedral micaceous clays (notably smectite), In su
ch sites, it is apparent that Fe-III is very difficult to reduce, Our
data suggest that diagenetic redox reactions are unlikely to be signif
icant in the burial interval 0.5-4.0 km. It is also apparent that subs
tantial iron reduction took place early during burial diagenesis with
precipitation of pyrite, siderite, and ferroan carbonates in the sulfa
te-reduction, methanogenic, and decarboxylation zones, respectively, A
ll these minerals are found in the studied mudstones from the shelf lo
calities, In contrast, within the graben mudstones, pyrite is the domi
nant Fe-II-rich mineral species present, We propose that the different
style of diagenesis in the two settings was produced by a fraction of
the reactive iron (i.e., that contained within soil sesquioxides) bei
ng converted to the pyrite prior to sediment remobilization, Resedimen
taton then allowed a second phase of sulfate reduction with replenishe
d pore-water sulfate from the anoxic bottom graben waters, The remaini
ng reactive iron was converted to pyrite, thereby preventing precipita
tion of Fe-rich carbonates in the deeper diagenetic zones, Hence, the
diagenetic iron-mineral assemblages in the different facies are quite
different, Diagenetic assemblages present in ancient siliciclastic sed
iments thus offer valuable insights into both sedimentary and diagenet
ic processes, but the links are complex and must be interpreted with c
are.