This article describes the development of a measure of role conflict.
Role conflict was conceptualized as consisting of four dimensions: int
rasender, intersender, interrole, and person-role conflict respectivel
y. Study 1 (N = 65), which was conducted to pilot test the 96 item que
stionnaire (reduced from 224 items after expert rating), resulted in t
he reduction of the questionnaire to 43 items with three interpretable
dimensions, Study 2 (N = 100) was carried out to examine the construc
t validity of the scale and confirm the factor structure. There was co
nvergence with the findings of Study 1. Cronbach alpha for each subsca
le was adequate, and evidence of concurrent convergent and discriminan
t validities was found Study 3 (N = 242) attempted to provide some nor
mative data for the measure, in addition to carrying out a confirmator
y factor analysis (CFA) using LISREL. The findings of Study 2 were alm
ost duplicated and the CFA results lent greater support to a three-fac
tor structure of role conflict.