A SHORT-TERM CLINICAL-STUDY DESIGN TO INVESTIGATE THE CHEMICAL PLAQUEINHIBITORY PROPERTIES OF MOUTHRINSES WHEN USED AS ADJUNCTS TO TOOTHPASTES - APPLIED TO CHLORHEXIDINE
J. Owens et al., A SHORT-TERM CLINICAL-STUDY DESIGN TO INVESTIGATE THE CHEMICAL PLAQUEINHIBITORY PROPERTIES OF MOUTHRINSES WHEN USED AS ADJUNCTS TO TOOTHPASTES - APPLIED TO CHLORHEXIDINE, Journal of clinical periodontology, 24(10), 1997, pp. 732-737
The removal of plaque by toothbrushing with toothpaste is the most com
mon form of plaque control in the developed world. However, the use of
chemical adjuncts such as mouthrinses is increasing. In practice mout
hrinses and toothpaste are used together, however, in many clinical tr
ials, employed to assess mouthrinse activity, toothpaste use is suspen
ded. This fails to measure the effect of chemical interactions which a
re known to occur between toothpaste ingredients and mouthrinses. The
objective of this trial was to develop a methodology which would asses
s the adjunctive chemical plaque inhibitory action of mouthrinses, whe
n used with toothpaste but without the indeterminate variable of tooth
brushing. The study was a single blind, randomised, 7-way crossover de
sign, based on a variation of a 4 day plaque regrowth model. The 2xdai
ly rinsing regimens produced increasing plaque scores in the following
order: (1) water/chlorhexidine, (2) chlorhexidine/water, (3) chlorhex
idine/toothpaste slurry, (4) toothpaste slurry/chlorhexidine, (5) wate
r/toothpaste slurry, (6) toothpaste slurry/water, (7) water/water. Chl
orhexidine and water or chlorhexidine and toothpaste slurry combinatio
ns produced significantly lower plaque scores than water alone. Slurry
and water combinations resulted in less plaque than water alone, but
differences were not significant. Toothpaste slurry and chlorhexidine
produced significantly increased plaque scores compared to chlorhexidi
ne and water. The study suggests that, outside the Hawthorne effect, c
hlorhexidine rinses would be less effective in reducing plaque when us
ed with toothpaste than when used alone. The methodology could be empl
oyed as a screening tool for the evaluation of mouthrinses expected to
be used as adjuncts to normal oral hygiene methods. The same could be
used to optimise oral hygiene regimens which include the use of mouth
rinses.