A MEDIAN-BASED TEST UNDER INFORMATIVE DROPOUT - THE ONE-SAMPLE CASE

Authors
Citation
Wm. Liang et Mb. Brown, A MEDIAN-BASED TEST UNDER INFORMATIVE DROPOUT - THE ONE-SAMPLE CASE, Controlled clinical trials, 18(5), 1997, pp. 445-459
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, Research & Experimental","Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
01972456
Volume
18
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
445 - 459
Database
ISI
SICI code
0197-2456(1997)18:5<445:AMTUID>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
We consider a clinical trial in which the outcome can be assessed by a continuous measure and where dropouts tend to have poorer efficacy th an completers. When each subject can act as his/her own control, effic acy is measured by the difference between the outcome measurements at two times. When all subjects complete the protocol, a paired t-test ca n be used to test for a treatment effect, i.e., whether or not the mea n difference is zero. When a patient does not return for the final eva luation, a measure of efficacy cannot be computed for that subject. Of ten, data from dropouts are ignored and only the observed pairs are us ed to analyze the data. When the reason for dropping out is not random , the result may be misleading. In this paper, we assume that (1) the distribution of the measure of efficacy (i.e., the change between two outcome measurements) is Gaussian, (2) dropouts would have worse effic acy than the median if they were observed, and (3) the dropout rate is less than 50%. We propose a median-based t-like statistic using the s ample median in place of the sample mean. The variance of the median i s estimated using only data from the complete half-sample, i.e., the h alf-sample with better efficacy. Simulations under five patterns of dr opouts are performed to compare the proposed statistic with the paired t-test. The results show that the median-based statistic provides a c onservative bound for the test of significance of the treatment. Ln co ntrast, because the paired t-test does not preserve its level of signi ficance, except when the dropout mechanism is uniform, the paired t-te st should not be used for trials in which dropouts tend to have poorer efficacy than completers. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 1997.