The indications for continuous insulin therapy during non-insulin-depe
ndent diabetes (NIDD) are numerous. In addition to patients with a con
traindication to oral treatment, the greatest cause is ''failures resu
lting from the use of hypoglycaemic agents''. According to data in lar
ge series published to date, these secondary failures occur at an annu
al rate ranging from 2 to 10 % and are more frequent in subjects whose
weight is normal or moderately high. in current medical practice in F
rance, the indications for insulin therapy are considered late, in the
presence of severe hyperglycaemia indicative of beta-cell failure. Fr
om then on, the problem raised is that of the glycaemic goal to be rea
ched, which has an influence on the therapeutic strategy to he adopted
. in addition to the risk of microangiopathy, NIDD patients run a very
high risk of macroangiopathy, particularly when insulin therapy is in
itiated late. In patients whose life expectancy is fairly long (7 to 1
0 years or more), a body of convergent clinical and epidemiological ev
idence favours strict glycaemic control, i.e. intensive insulin therap
y. The results of the DCCT are apparently applicable to NIDD with resp
ect to microangiopathy, and hyperglycaemia is an independent risk fact
or for cardiovascular disease in NIDD patients. Strict glycaemic contr
ol is often associated with improvement in certain risk factors (lipid
s, hemorheology). Despite the fact that no large controlled prospectiv
e study similar to the DCCT is currently available for NIDD, efficient
insulin therapy ensuring good glycaemic balance should be performed i
n these patients. However, the difficulties inherent to the implementa
tion of intensive insulin therapy during NIDD should not he neglected:
hypoglycaemic risk, weight gain, problems in elderly subjects, diffic
ulties in instructing patients, and follow-up. Finally, the return to
adequate glycaemic control should he coordinated with an overall care
plan for risk factors relative to macroangiopathy.