Rm. Lang et al., COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF LOSARTAN AND ENALAPRIL ON EXERCISE CAPACITY AND CLINICAL STATUS IN PATIENTS WITH HEART-FAILURE, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 30(4), 1997, pp. 983-991
Objectives. This study was designed to determine 1) whether 12-week or
al administration of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist,
in patients with heart failure is well tolerated; and 2) whether funct
ional capacity and clinical status of patients with heart failure in w
hom treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor is
replaced with losartan for 12 weeks will remain similar to that noted
in patients in whom treatment with an ACE inhibitor is continued. Bac
kground. Losartan is a specific, nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor an
tagonist. Although specific receptor blockade with losartan has certai
n theoretic advantages over nonspecific ACE inhibition, definitive dem
onstration of comparable effects ia patients with congestive heart fai
lure is lacking. Methods. A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, par
allel, enalapril-controlled study was conducted in 116 patients with c
ongestive heart failure (New York Heart Association functional classes
II to IV) and left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal t
o 45% previously treated with stable doses of ACE inhibitors and diure
tic agents, with or without concurrent digitalis and other vasodilator
s. After a baseline exercise period, open-label ACE inhibitors were di
scontinued, and patients were randomly as signed to 12 weeks of therap
y with losartan, 25 mg/day (n = 38); losartan, 50 mg/day (n = 40); or
enalapril, 20 mg/day (n = 38). Drug efficacy was evaluated by changes
in maximal treadmill exercise time (using a modified Naughton protocol
), 6-min walk test, left ventricular ejection fraction and dyspnea-fat
igue index. Safety was measured by the incidence of clinical and labor
atory adverse experiences. Results. The treadmill exercise time and th
e 6-min walk test did not change significantly after replacement of AC
E inhibitor therapy with losartan. Similarly, a significant change was
not observed in either the dyspnea-fatigue index or left ventricular
ejection fraction at the end of double-blind period relative to baseli
ne. Conclusions. Losartan was generally well tolerated and comparable
to enalapril in terms of exercise tolerance in this short-term (12-wee
k) study of patients with heart failure. The clinical effects of long-
term angiotensin II receptor blockade compared with ACE inhibition rem
ain to be studied. (C) 1997 by the American College of Cardiology.