M. Fukue et al., RECOVERY FROM INCREASED PRESSURE OR INCREASED LEAKINESS EDEMA IN PERFUSED SHEEP LUNGS, Journal of applied physiology, 77(1), 1994, pp. 184-189
Two routes by which interstitial pulmonary edema liquid may leave the
lung during recovery are reabsorption into the pulmonary circulation a
nd clearance by lung lymphatics. We hypothesized that reabsorption of
edema liquid of low protein concentration into the pulmonary circulati
on would be greater than reabsorption of edema liquid of high protein
concentration because of the greater protein osmotic gradient in the f
ormer. On the basis of previous studies, lymph flow should contribute
minimally to the recovery. In 22 in situ perfused sheep lungs with lym
ph fistulas, we produced similar to 100 g of osmotic or hydrostatic ed
ema (low protein) or increased leakiness edema by calcium depletion (h
igh protein). To induce reabsorption, we changed the perfusate from lo
w- (1% albumin, osmotic pressure = 4 cmH(2)O) to high-protein (7% albu
min, osmotic pressure = 22 cmH(2)O) solution in the osmotic group, dec
reased capillary pressure from 29 +/- 9 to 11 +/- 6 cmH(2)O in the hyd
rostatic group, or reversed leakiness by adding CaCl2 to the perfusate
in the increased leakiness group. Reabsorption occurred only during r
ecovery from osmotic (40 +/- 22% of filtered liquid) and hydrostatic (
15 +/- 11%) edema. Total lung lymph flow during recovery from osmotic,
hydrostatic, or increased leakiness edema was 4.9 +/- 3.4, 4.3 +/- 3.
4, or 3.5 +/- 1.9 g, respectively. We conclude that during recovery fr
om pulmonary edema interstitial liquid is reabsorbed into the circulat
ion in inverse proportion to its protein concentration. We confirm tha
t only a small fraction of the interstitial edema liquid is cleared by
the lymphatics during recovery from any type of edema.