Some analyses of longitudinal blood pressure data have focussed on the
question of whether a current value of blood pressure is predictive o
f subsequent rate of change. A positive correlation between blood pres
sure values at the beginning of a longitudinal study and rate of chang
e over the course of the study has been found in studies of adults. Ne
gative correlation, however, has been found in a study of children. Th
ese studies, either implicitly or explicitly, rely on linear growth cu
rve models in which subjects' blood pressure observations are assumed
to follow simple linear regression models with slopes and intercepts v
arying among subjects, but with the slopes constant over time. Our ana
lysis of a longitudinal data set of 2,203 measurements of systolic blo
od pressure from 216 children also provided a negative estimate of the
correlation. However, smoothed plots of cross products of residuals s
uggested that an alternative random effects model, in which rate of ch
ange of systolic blood pressure is not treated as constant over time,
might better fit the data. It is possible that the negative estimates
of the correlation found in children's blood pressure data are an arti
fact of assuming a constant rate of change when the data actually foll
ow the alternative model. It is shown that the expected result of fitt
ing the linear growth curve model to data that follow the alternative
model is an apparent negative correlation between slope and intercept.
In the data, the observed estimates of the parameters of the linear g
rowth curve model are consistent with the observed estimates of the pa
rameters of the alternative model.