OBSERVATIONS OF FATIGUE-CRACK INITIATION AND PROPAGATION IN AN EPOXY ADHESIVE

Fatigue crack initiation and propagation were investigated in structur al adhesive joints consisting of 7075T6 aluminium adherends bonded wit h a mineral filled structural epoxy (Cybond 4523GB, American Cyanamid) . Three types of joints were tested to achieve mode I (double-cantilev er beam specimen, DCB), mixed mode I-II (cracked lap shear specimen, C LS), and mode II (end notch flexure specimen, ENF). All tests were con ducted under ambient conditions with load ratio of 0.1 at a frequency of 30Hz. Fatigue loading significantly reduced the strain energy relea se rate (G) required to initiate a crack compared with static and quas i-static loading. For the load ranges tested, fatigue precracks double d the time to cause a resumption of crack growth under mode I loading. Negligible differences in crack initiation times (time to generate a crack from a fillet or resume extension of an existing crack) were obs erved for mixed-mode I-II and mode II specimens with cracks starting f rom fast mode I precracks, intact fillets and fatigue precracks. For t he adhesive system tested, the relative influence of the mode ratio de pended on whether the rate of crack propagation was plotted versus G(m ax) or %G(C) (percentage of the quasi-static critical energy release r ate at the particular mode ratio). When expressed as a function of % G (C), debonding rates were greatest under mixed-mode conditions at a gi ven %G(C), and were indistinguishable under mode I and mode II loading . However, when expressed as a function of G(max), the propagation rat es at a given G(max) were the same under mixed-mode and mode I loading , and smaller under mode II loading. This means that the allowable loa ds for joints in fatigue will depend on the mode ratio; for mixed-mode joints it will be a smaller fraction of the quasi-static allowable lo ad than for mode I or mode II joints. Threshold energy release rates ( G(max)) under mode I and mixed mode I-II loading were essentially the same, and were obtained equally from extrapolated crack propagation ra tes or crack initiation times. For this adhesive system, it is recomme nded that adhesive joint design be based on threshold values for zero crack growth, because crack propagation rates show too much scatter to be relied upon for the prediction of in-service subcritical crack gro wth, particularly under mode I and mode II loading. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.