EFFECTIVENESS OF A PAIR-GAIN FEEDING STRATEGY FOR INDIVIDUALLY FED, GROUP-HOUSED FINISHING PIGS

Citation
Pjl. Ramaekers et al., EFFECTIVENESS OF A PAIR-GAIN FEEDING STRATEGY FOR INDIVIDUALLY FED, GROUP-HOUSED FINISHING PIGS, Journal of animal science, 75(10), 1997, pp. 2691-2696
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
Journal title
ISSN journal
00218812
Volume
75
Issue
10
Year of publication
1997
Pages
2691 - 2696
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(1997)75:10<2691:EOAPFS>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Crossbred barrows (n = 48) and gilts (n = 12) were used to examine the effectiveness of a pair-gain feeding strategy for individually fed, g roup-housed barrows. In a pair-gain feeding strategy, barrows were ind ividually restricted to a feeding level at which their growth was simi lar to the mean growth of gilts with ad libitum access to feed. The pu rposes of this feeding strategy were to have barrows and gilts reach s laughter weight at the same time and to improve carcass traits of the barrows. At 29.8 +/- .4 kg BW, barrows were assigned to either the pai r-gain or the ad libitum treatment. All pigs had free access to feed u ntil they reached 60 kg BW. The experimental period was from 60 to 110 kg BW. The 12 group-fed gilts and 24 individually fed barrows (12 per pen) were also given free access to feed throughout the experimental period. The remaining 24 barrows (12 per pen) were put on a pair-gain feeding strategy. In the pair-gain feeding strategy, the weekly feed a llowance of each barrow was based on its measured BW and computed ener gy conversion ratio and on the mean growth of the gilts. The barrows i n the pair-gain treatment grew at the same rate as gilts. The ad libit um intake barrows grew faster (P < .05) and had a poorer energy conver sion ratio for production than the barrows in the pair-gain treatment. The total energy conversion ratio, backfat thickness, and lean meat p ercentage were similar (P > .10) for the two treatments. In conclusion , the pair-gain feeding strategy was effective in achieving similar gr owth between barrows and gilts. The total energy conversion ratio and carcass traits of the barrows, however, were not improved.