The paper continues an analysis of the field of information policy as
a field of scholarship. The first part of the analysis was reported in
an earlier paper and was linked to the call of Ian Rowlands for 'valu
e-critical and paradigm-critical' approaches in information policy. Th
e paper begins by comparing research in information policy with the ou
tput of the field of policy studies. It concludes that there are subst
antial gaps in the range of information policy research relative to th
e scope of policy studies. The gaps are located in areas where value-a
nd paradigm-critical approaches could have most impact in taking the f
ield of information policy to intellectual maturity. The implications
of adopting value-and paradigm-critical approaches to scholarship are
explored within the context of the new interpretative social sciences
which are dominating much of contemporary scholarship, Some approaches
and frameworks from the new methodologies which are seen as particula
rly relevant to information policy are described. A case is made for e
xtending the range of research paradigms employed in information polic
y research in the interests of strengthening its currently inadequate
intellectual foundations.