CONFORMATIONAL MODULATION OF ELECTRON-TRANSFER WITHIN ELECTROSTATIC PORPHYRIN - CYTOCHROME-C COMPLEXES

Citation
Rw. Larsen et al., CONFORMATIONAL MODULATION OF ELECTRON-TRANSFER WITHIN ELECTROSTATIC PORPHYRIN - CYTOCHROME-C COMPLEXES, JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 101(40), 1997, pp. 8012-8020
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Physical
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
ISSN journal
15206106 → ACNP
Volume
101
Issue
40
Year of publication
1997
Pages
8012 - 8020
Database
ISI
SICI code
1089-5647(1997)101:40<8012:CMOEWE>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The present study examines photoinduced electron transfer within self- assembled complexes between cytochrome c and either free base uroporph yrin (URO) or free base tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (4CP). In both systems, complexation of the porphyrin to the protein results in bathochromic shifts in the absorption bands of the porphyrin. Interest ingly, equilibrium circular dichroism data demonstrate significant dif ferences in the orientation of the bound porphyrins. The effect of ori entational differences on photoinduced electron transfer between the b ound porphyrin and the heme group of cytochrome c are demonstrated in the steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence and triplet-triplet tr ansient absorption data obtained for the two complexes. In the case of the cytochrome c-4CP complex, the singlet state of the 4CP is signifi cantly quenched by the heme group of the protein. Analysis of the time -resolved fluorescence data reveals two discrete lifetime components a t 9.3 (free 4CP) and 1.27 ns (bound 4CP). In contrast, the singlet sta te of URO is only moderately quenched by complexation to the protein. Fluorescence lifetime analysis reveals two components consisting of a discrete component at 15.7 ns (free URO) and a Lorentzian distribution of lifetimes centered at 3.8 ns. However, URO exhibits significant tr iplet-state quenching, resulting in intercomplex electron transfer in which the observed forward and reverse rates are similar ((1.8 +/- 0.2 ) x 10(6) and (1.6 +/- 0.4) x 10(6) s(-1), respectively). The differen ce in ET mechanism (i.e., singlet versus tripler) can be rationalized in terms of distinct dipole orientations of the bound porphyrins relat ive to the heme group of the protein, We further speculate that the or ientational differences between bound URO and bound 4CP arise due to t ile flexibility of the URO side chains.