G. Minardi et al., DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF DIPYRIDAMOLE AND DOBUTAMINE STRESSECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH Q-WAVE ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION, The American journal of cardiology, 80(7), 1997, pp. 847-851
The aim of this study was to compare dipyridamole and dobutamine stres
s echocardiography, performed early in patients with acute myocardial
infarction (AMI) to evaluate residual ischemia, viability, and prognos
is. Fifty patients (mean age 55 +/- 9 years, 47 men, 3 women) with AMI
, all treated with thrombolytic therapy, underwent standard dipyridamo
le and dobutamine tests, within the fifth day of the event. Wall motio
n score index and the 16 segments model were used to evaluate contract
ility. Forty-seven patients underwent coronary angiography within the
tenth day of the event. The mean follow-vp was 24 +/- 12 months. No si
de effects occurred during both tests. Both dipyridamole and dobutamin
e tests were positive for ischemia, in 32 and 33 of 47 patients, respe
ctively (sensitivity 73% and 75%; specificity 67% and 67%); these test
s induced an improvement of contractility in 23 and 38 of 139 abnormal
segments at baseline, respectively (sensitivity 52% and 86%; specific
ity 100% and 100%). Cardiac events occurred in 26 of 50 patients, 22 w
ith a positive dipyridamole test and 21 with positive dobutamine test.
Thus, both tests were feasible, safe, and useful to evaluate residual
ischemia, viability, and prognosis. No significant differences were f
ound in sensitivity and specificity between tests. (C) 1997 by Excerpt
a Medico, Inc.