Bm. Ramza et al., SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF PLACEMENT OF PACEMAKER AND DEFIBRILLATOR LEADS IN THE AXILLARY VEIN GUIDED BY CONTRAST VENOGRAPHY, The American journal of cardiology, 80(7), 1997, pp. 892-896
Despite evidence of an increased incidence of lead fracture, the infra
clavicular subclavian approach remains the dominant approach for place
ment of pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads. Although this c
omplication can be prevented by lead placement in the cephalic vein or
by recently described approaches for lead placement in the axillary v
ein, these approaches have not gained widespread acceptance. The purpo
se of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an alterna
tive technique for lead placement that uses contrast-guided venipunctu
re of the axillary vein with a 5Fr micropuncture introducer set, A fet
al of 50 patients underwent an attempt at placement of pacemaker or im
plantable defibrillator leads via the axillary vein using this new tec
hnique. Patients were randomized into 2 groups based on whether the in
itial attempt at axillary vein access was performed medial or lateral
to the rib cage margin. Leed placement was successfully accomplished i
n 49 of the 50 patients using this technique. initial success was achi
eved in each of 25 patients randomized to the medial approach compared
with 18 of 24 patients randomized to the lateral approach to the axil
lary vein (75%). In each of the 6 patients in whom the initial techniq
ue failed, lead placement was subsequently achieved with the medial ap
proach. In addition to a higher initial success rate, the medial appro
ach was determined to be preferable as evidenced by a shorter lead pla
cement time, a smaller number of contrast injections, and a reduced re
quirement for additional micropuncture guidewires. There were no major
complications associated with either approach. Contrast-guided venipu
ncture of the axillary vein is a safe and effective approach to placem
ent of endocardial leads. (C) 1997 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.