J. Joris et al., POSTOPERATIVE SPIROMETRY AFTER LAPAROSCOPY FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL OR UPPER ABDOMINAL SURGICAL-PROCEDURES, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 79(4), 1997, pp. 422-426
In this prospective study, we have compared women undergoing laparosco
pic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic gynaecological surgery and laparosco
pic minor gynaecological procedures (diagnostic, tubal ligation) (n=10
in each group) to determine if lower abdominal laparoscopy results in
less postoperative pulmonary dysfunction than upper abdominal laparos
copy. Pulmonary testing was performed before operation, and 3 and 6 h
after operation, on the first and second days after surgery. After ope
ration, a significant reduction in forced viral capacity, forced expir
atory volume in 1 s and peak expiratory flow rate occurred after lapar
oscopic cholecystectomy at each time. There were no significant change
s after minor gynaecologic laparoscopy, whereas laparoscopic gynaecolo
gical surgery resulted in minor pulmonary dysfunction on the day of su
rgery only. We conclude that postoperative pulmonary function was less
impaired after gynaecological laparoscopy than after laparoscopic cho
lecystectomy. This study suggests that the site of surgery is an impor
tant determinant of lung dysfunction after laparoscopy.