Pjl. Jebson et Wd. Engber, RADIAL TUNNEL-SYNDROME - LONG-TERM RESULTS OF SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION, The Journal of hand surgery, 22A(5), 1997, pp. 889-896
Between 1980 and 1990, 31 patients (33 extremities) underwent decompre
ssion of the radial tunnel. All procedures were performed at the same
institution by the senior author using a brachioradialis muscle-splitt
ing approach. Twenty-three patients (24 extremities) were available fo
r follow-up evaluation at an average of 8 years after surgery. The out
come was determined using the original criteria of Roles and Maudsley
and Ritts et al. By the criteria of Roles and Maudsley, outcomes for 1
5 patients (16 extremities; 57%) were rated as excellent/good and for
8 patients (8 extremities; 33%), as fair/poor. By the criteria of Ritt
s et al., 16 patients (17 extremities; 71%) had good results and 7 pat
ients (7 extremities; 29%), a fair/poor result. Overall, the majority
of patients were satisfied and felt helped by the surgery. Five patien
ts changed their occupation because of continued discomfort. Significa
nt differences in outcome were not found for workers' compensation pat
ients. Similarly, no differences in outcome were found for site of com
pression, patient sex, history of trauma, or associated neuropathies.
The results of this study suggest that complete pain relief and return
to activities following radial tunnel surgery is not as predictable a
s previous studies have indicated. Nineteen patients (20 extremities),
however, felt satisfied and helped and believed they gained improved
function because of surgical decompression of the radial tunnel.