Mj. Tipton et al., AN EXAMINATION OF 2 EMERGENCY BREATHING AIDS FOR USE DURING HELICOPTER UNDERWATER ESCAPE, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 68(10), 1997, pp. 907-914
Background: There is a paucity of published work in which the performa
nce of Emergency Underwater Breathing Aids (EUBA) has been examined in
the wide range of scenarios in which helicopter underwater escape may
be necessary. In the present investigation two EUBA were examined: th
e Air Packet (AP) rebreather and the Short Term Air Supply System (STA
SS) SCUBA set. Method: Young, healthy male subjects undertook simple s
imulated helicopter underwater escapes in water at 15 degrees C and/or
5 degrees C. During the immersions the subjects attempted to remain s
ubmerged for 60 s while traversing back and forth along a ladder secur
ed at a depth of 1.25 m. At each temperature the subjects used AP and
STASS twice. The subjects were dressed in the Royal Navy winter sea he
licopter aircrew equipment assembly and an aircrew helmet. Results: Bo
th AP and STASS significantly extended the underwater survival time of
individuals when compared to their maximum breath-hold time (BHT). It
is clear from the measurements made of gas concentrations in AP; the
volume of air used from STASS; and subjective responses, that the 60-s
submersions were achieved more easily with STASS than AP. Conclusion:
it is concluded that in conditions similar to those of the present ex
periment STASS will give a longer underwater duration than AP, but thi
s benefit must be offset: against the possible risk of pulmonary barot
rauma associated with the use of STASS, as well as increased training
and maintenance costs. Irrespective of the EUBA which is provided, in-
water training, preferably including exposure to cold water, will sign
ificantly improve the ability of an individual to use it.