S. Pecina et al., PIMOZIDE DOES NOT SHIFT PALATABILITY - SEPARATION OF ANHEDONIA FROM SENSORIMOTOR SUPPRESSION BY TASTE REACTIVITY, Pharmacology, biochemistry and behavior, 58(3), 1997, pp. 801-811
Several ''taste reactivity'' studies of dopamine and reward have concl
uded that pimozide suppresses the hedonic reaction patterns normally e
licited by sucrose but enhances aversive reaction patterns elicited by
quinine. However, other taste reactivity studies have failed to find
hedonic/aversive shifts in reaction patterns after dopamine antagonist
s or dopamine lesions. The divergent conclusions have come from two di
fferent laboratories. To resolve the controversy regarding dopamine bl
ockade and palatability, the present study joined the two laboratories
to investigate the effect of pimozide on taste reactivity patterns el
icited by sucrose and quinine. The results replicated many (but not al
l) of the earlier findings and identified procedural factors responsib
le for different outcomes. Overall, the results provide evidence for s
ensorimotor effects of pimozide on taste reactivity but not for a hedo
nic shift in palatability. Pimozide suppressed both hedonic and aversi
ve reaction patterns in a gradual sensorimotor fashion when the elicit
ing taste stimulus was repeated or continued for several minutes. The
general suppression typically did not alter the initial reaction to a
taste but emerged only after an oral infusion of sucrose or quinine co
ntinued for several minutes or trials. Aversive reactions were never e
nhanced. The balance between hedonic and aversive reaction patterns wa
s not shifted by pimozide. We conclude that pimozide produces a sensor
imotor impairment of taste reactivity patterns but does not shift tast
e palatability toward anhedonia or aversion. (C) 1997 Elevier Science
Inc.