The impact of initial condition uncertainty (ICU) on quantitative prec
ipitation forecasts (QPFs) is examined for a case of explosive cycloge
nesis that occurred over the contiguous United States and produced wid
espread, substantial rainfall. The Pennsylvania State University-Natio
nal Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Mesoscale Model Version 4 (
MM4), a limited-area model, is run at 80-km horizontal resolution and
15 layers to produce a 25-member, 36-h forecast ensemble. Lateral boun
dary conditions for MM4 are provided by ensemble forecasts from a glob
al spectral model, the NCAR Community Climate Model Version 1 (CCM1).
The initial perturbations of the ensemble members possess a magnitude
and spatial decomposition that closely match estimates of global analy
sis error, but they are not dynamically conditioned. Results for the 8
0-km ensemble forecast are compared to forecasts from the then operati
onal Nested Grid Model (NGM), a single 40-km/15-layer MM4 forecast, a
single 80-km/29-layer MM4 forecast, and a second 25-member MM4 ensembl
e based on a different cumulus parameterization and slightly different
unperturbed initial conditions. Large sensitivity to ICU marks ensemb
le QPF. Extrema in 6-h accumulations at individual grid points vary by
as much as 3.00 ''. Ensemble averaging reduces the root-mean-square e
rror (rmse) for QPF. Nearly 90% of the improvement is obtainable using
ensemble sizes as small as 8-10. Ensemble averaging can adversely aff
ect the bias and equitable threat scores, however, because of its smoo
thing nature. Probabilistic forecasts for five mutually exclusive, com
pletely exhaustive categories are found to be skillful relative to a c
limatological forecast. Ensemble sizes of approximately 10 can account
for 90% of improvement in categorical forecasts relative to that for
the average of individual forecasts. The improvements due to short-ran
ge ensemble forecasting (SREF) techniques exceed any due to doubling t
he resolution, and the error growth due to ICU greatly exceeds that du
e to different resolutions. If the authors' results are representative
, they indicate that SREF can now provide useful QPF guidance and incr
ease the accuracy of QPF when used with current analysis-forecast syst
ems.