H. Mannaerts et al., INFLUENCE OF HEART-RATE, RESPIRATION AND RECIPIENT ATRIAL CONTRACTIONON PULSED WAVE TRANSMITRAL DOPPLER FLOW INDEXES IN ORTHOTOPIC HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS, European heart journal, 18(10), 1997, pp. 1663-1669
Aims The study set out to assess the relative contributions of donor h
eart rate, respiration and recipient atrial contrac tion on the mean o
f pulsed wave transmitral Doppler flow indices in orthotopic heart tra
nsplant recipients. This would provide information on the theoretical
usefulness of pacemaker synchronization of recipient atrial contractio
n, as well as on the validity of certain strategies used for pulsed wa
ve Dopper analysis of diastolic left ventricular function, which have
excluded beats based on recipient atrial contraction timing. Methods T
hirty two consecutive patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplanta
tion in our centre were prospectively studied. The following Dopper in
dices were analysed. peak early diastolic velocity (E) and its area un
der the Doppler curve (TVIE), diastolic velocity after donor atrial co
ntraction (A) and its area under the curve (TVIA), the total area unde
r the curve (TVI), the isovolumic relaxation period (IVR), the diastol
ic filling period, the normalized peak filling rate and the pressure h
alf time. Results Only 81 out of 347 recordings (23%) allowed analysis
of the recipient P wave and thus recipient atrial contraction timing,
heart rate and the respiration phase in 22 patients for a total of 15
79 beats. The isovolumic relaxation period, E, pressure half time and
TVIA are not influenced by donor heart rate. For the isovolumic relaxa
tion period, E, TVI and TVIE, respiration contributes as much as recip
ient atrial contraction timing to beat-to-beat variation. Pressure hal
f time, the diastolic filling period and peak filling rate were not af
fected by respiration. TVI was not affected by recipient atrial contra
ction timing. Conclusion With respect to analysis of diastolic functio
n: exclusion of beats based on recipient atrial contraction timing is
invalid for the isovolumic relaxation period, E, TVI and TVIE, since t
hese are equally influenced by respiration. Since TVI was not affected
by recipient atrial contraction timing, pacemaker synchronization of
donor and recipient atria is not expected to be useful in patients wit
h left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.