AN OPEN ASSESSMENT OF THE ACCEPTABILITY, EFFICACY, AND TOLERANCE OF VENLAFAXINE IN USUAL CARE SETTINGS

Citation
Eg. Ruelas et al., AN OPEN ASSESSMENT OF THE ACCEPTABILITY, EFFICACY, AND TOLERANCE OF VENLAFAXINE IN USUAL CARE SETTINGS, Current therapeutic research, 58(9), 1997, pp. 609-630
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Medicine, Research & Experimental
ISSN journal
0011393X
Volume
58
Issue
9
Year of publication
1997
Pages
609 - 630
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-393X(1997)58:9<609:AOAOTA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
An open-label study in 518 outpatients with major depression was perfo rmed by a collaborative group involving 105 psychiatrists in 22 cities in Mexico. The objectives of this study were to assess the tolerance and efficacy of venlafaxine, a new antidepressive drug, in outpatients in usual care settings. The two largest psychiatric medical associati ons approved the proposed protocol, and their chairmen coordinated the study. Patients had to comply with the diagnostic criteria for major depression as stated in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Menta l Disorders, 3rd edition, revised. The Hamilton Depression rating scal e (21 items) and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) rating scale we re used to assess a patient's clinical response to drug, which was pre scribed in different doses (37.5 to 75 mg, 100 to 150 mg, and 175 to 3 00 mg) according to a patient's status at enrollment. Patients were fo llowed for 6 weeks. A total of 435 patients (84%) completed the study. After 7 days of treatment with venlafaxine, there was a statistically significant improvement in patients with mild-to-moderate depression- those in the 37.5- to 75-mg group (mean CGI improvement, 3.8% to 38.2% ) and in the 100- to 150-mg group (mean CGI improvement, 1.3% to 16.7% )-and by day 14 in patients with severe depression-those in the 175- t o 300-mg group (mean CGI improvement at day 14, 1.8% to 20.0%). The ef ficacy of venlafaxine was assessed in all three groups by day 42, with statistically significant improvement observed after treatment with v enlafaxine as compared with baseline. The adverse events most frequent ly associated with the use of venlafaxine were nausea (35.13%) and hea dache (17.95%), which did not differ in nature and intensity from that reported by other investigators. A total of 83 patients withdrew hom the study; 50 of these dropped out due to an adverse event. Although t he study design weakened the conclusions drawn hom this study, in this 6-week, open-label, uncontrolled trial, venlafaxine appeared to be an efficacious, well-tolerated antidepressant in patients with major dep ression, with improvement generally detected in about 1 week.