I. Noguera et al., POTENTIATION BY VASOPRESSIN OF ADRENERGIC VASOCONSTRICTION IN THE RATISOLATED MESENTERIC-ARTERY, British Journal of Pharmacology, 122(3), 1997, pp. 431-438
1. The aim of the present study was to investigate in rat mesenteric a
rtery rings whether low concentrations of vasopressin could modify the
contractile responses to noradrenaline and electrical stimulation of
perivascular nerves. 2. Vasopressin (10(-10)-10(-7) M) caused concentr
ation-dependent contractions (pD(2)=8.36+/-0.09). The V-1-receptor ant
agonist d(CH2)(5)Tyr(Me)AVP (10(-9)-10(-8) M) produced parallel rightw
ard shifts of the control curve for vasopressin. Schild analysis yield
ed a pA(2) value of 9.83 with a slope of 1.10+/-0.14.3. Vasopressin (3
x10(-10) and 10(-9) M) caused concentration-dependent potentiation of
the contractions elicited by electrical stimulation (2-8 Hz; 0.2 ms du
ration for 30 s) and produced leftward shifts of the concentration-res
ponse curve for noradrenaline. The V-1-receptor antagonist induced con
centration-dependent inhibitions of potentiation induced by vasopressi
n. The selective V-1-receptor agonist [Phe(2), Orn(8)]-vasotocin (3x10
(-10) and 10(-9) M) induced potentiation of electrical stimulation-evo
ked responses which was also inhibited in the presence of the V-1 anta
gonist (10(-8) M). In contrast, the V-2-receptor agonist deamino-8-D-a
rginine vasopressin (desmopressin 10(-8)-10(-7) M) did not modify the
electrical stimulation-induced responses and the V-2-receptor antagoni
st [d(CH2)(5), D-Ile(2), Ile(4), Arg(8)]-vasopressin (10(-8)-10(-7) M)
did not affect the potentiation evoked by vasopressin. 4. In artery r
ings contracted by 10(-6) M noradrenaline in the presence of 10(-6) M
guanethidine and 10(-6) M atropine, electrical stimulation (2, 4 and 8
Hz) produced frequency-dependent relaxations which were unaffected by
10(-9) M vasopressin but abolished by 10(-6) M tetrodotoxin. 5. Vasop
ressin also potentiated contractions elicited by KC1 and contractions
induced by addition of CaCl2 to KC1 depolarized vessels. The augmentin
g effects were inhibited by the V-1 antagonist. 6. In the presence of
the calcium antagonist nifedipine (10(-6) M), vasopressin failed to en
hance the contractile responses to electrical stimulation, noradrenali
ne and KC1. 7. The results demonstrate that low concentrations of vaso
pressin strongly potentiate the contractions to adrenergic stimulation
and KC1 depolarization. This effect appears to be mediated by V-1 rec
eptor stimulation which brings about an increase in calcium entry thro
ugh dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels.