Aj. Batey et al., COMPARISON OF THE ACUTE CARDIOTOXICITY OF THE ANTIMALARIAL DRUG HALOFANTRINE IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO IN ANESTHETIZED GUINEA-PIGS, British Journal of Pharmacology, 122(3), 1997, pp. 563-569
1 Several unrelated drugs have pro-arrhythmic activity associated with
an ability to prolong the QT interval of the ECG. The aim of this wor
k was to examine the effects of the antimalarial drug halofantrine in
vivo and in vitro. 2 In anaesthetized guinea-pigs consecutive bolus do
ses of halofantrine (0.3, 1, 3, 10 and 30 mg kg(-1), i.v.) at 25 min i
ntervals caused dose-dependent prolongation of the rate corrected QTc
interval and bradycardia. The change in heart rate became significant
after administration of 10 mg kg(-1) halofantrine (-23+/-9 beats min(-
1)) whereas the increase in QTc was significant with only 1 mg kg(-1)
halofantrine (22+/-10 ms). It was only with the highest dose of halofa
ntrine that the PR interval was increased (from 52+/-3 to 67+/-4 ms) a
nd second degree atrioventricular (AV) block (type 1 Mobitz) occurred
in all animals. No changes were observed in any parameters in a separa
te group of guinea-pigs which received vehicle (dimethylacetamide 60%
propylene glycol 40%) at equivalent time points. 3 The blood concentra
tions of halofantrine ranged from 0.26+/-0.17 mu M after administratio
n of 0.3 mg kg(-1) to 2.79+/-0.87 mu M after 30 mg kg(-1), i.v. There
was a significant correlation between the blood concentrations of halo
fantrine and the changes in QTc interval. 4 In guinea-pig left papilla
ry muscles the effective refractory period was increased significantly
60 min after addition of halofantrine; from 161+/-4 to 173+/-6 ms wit
h 10 mu M, 156+/-8 to 174+/-6 ms with 30 mu M and 165+/-6 to 179+/-5 m
s with 100 mu M halofantrine. However, the vehicle (0.1% Tween 80 in D
MSO; final concentration of Vehicle in Krebs, 1%) also increased the e
ffective refractory period from 164+/-5 to 173+/-6 ms. Similar results
were obtained in right ventricular strips but left atrial effective r
efractory periods were not altered by either the vehicle or halofantri
ne. 5 The results of these experiments suggest that any direct effects
that halofantrine may have had on the effective refractory period of
cardiac muscle cannot be separated from those of the vehicle. The prol
ongation of QTc and consistent observation of AV block with halofantri
ne in anaesthetized guineapigs suggest that in vivo models may be more
useful for further studies investigating the mechanisms underlying th
e cardiotoxicity of halofantrine.