A. Dart et al., A MULTICENTER DOUBLE-BLIND, ONE-YEAR STUDY COMPARING SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS SIMVASTATIN IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA, Perfusion, 10(9), 1997, pp. 296
We directly compared the safety and efficacy of atorvastatin and simva
statin in hypercholesterolemic patients. This 1-year, randomized, doub
le-blind study was performed at 9 community-and university-based resea
rch hospitals in Australia, 177 patients between the ages of 18 and 80
years with baseline low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol greater
than or equal to 4.14 and less than or equal to 7.76 mmol/L (160 and
300 mg/dl, respectively) and triglycerides less than or equal to 4.52
mmol/L (400 mg/dl) received once daily dosing with atorvastatin 10 mg
or simvastatin 10 mg, At week 16, the dose of medication was titrated
to atorvastatin 20 mg or simvastatin 20 mg if patients did not meet LD
L cholesterol target of less than or equal to 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dl),
Efficacy was reported as percent change from baseline in LDL choleste
rol, total cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, tota
l triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoproteins
A1 and B, and lipoprotein(a). Atorvastatin caused significantly great
er reductions from baseline than did simvastatin for LDL cholesterol,
total cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycer
ides, and apolipoprotein B (p < 0.05). No patient in either treatment
group had clinically important elevations in creatine phosphokinase, a
lanine aminotransaminase, or aspartate aminotransaminase. No serious a
dverse events were considered associated,vith treatment. With atorvast
atin 10 mg, 46% of the patients achieved LDL cholesterol target goal b
y week 16, whereas only 27% of the simvastatin patients achieved the t
arget goal at the 10-mg dose. This cholesterol-lowering profile afford
s utility in many patient types.