RISK ADJUSTMENT OF THE POSTOPERATIVE MORBIDITY RATE FOR THE COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF SURGICAL CARE - RESULTS OF THE NATIONAL VETERANS AFFAIRS SURGICAL RISK STUDY
J. Daley et al., RISK ADJUSTMENT OF THE POSTOPERATIVE MORBIDITY RATE FOR THE COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF SURGICAL CARE - RESULTS OF THE NATIONAL VETERANS AFFAIRS SURGICAL RISK STUDY, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 185(4), 1997, pp. 328-340
Background: The National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study was desi
gned to collect reliable, valid data on patient risk and outcomes for
major surgery in the Veterans Health Administration and to report comp
arative risk-adjusted postoperative mortality and morbidity rates for
surgical services in the Veterans Health Administration. Study Design:
This was a cohort study conducted at 44 Veterans Affairs Medical Cent
ers closely affiliated with university medical centers. Included were
87,078 major noncardiac operations performed under general, spinal, or
epidural anesthesia between October 1, 1991, and December 31, 1993. T
he main outcomes measures in this report are 21 postoperative adverse
events (morbidities) occurring within 30 days after the index procedur
e. Multivariable logistic regression risk-adjustment models for all op
erations and for eight surgical subspecialties were developed, Results
: Patient risk factors predictive of postoperative morbidity included
serum albumin level, American Society of Anesthesia class, the complex
ity of the operation, and 17 other preoperative risk variables. Wide v
ariation in the unadjusted rates of one or more postoperative morbidit
ies for all operations was observed across the 44 hospitals (7.4-28.4%
). Risk-adjusted observed-to-expected ratios ranged from 0.49 to 1.46.
The Spearman rank order correlation between the ranking of the hospit
als based on unadjusted morbidity rates and risk-adjusted observed-to-
expected ratios for all operations was 0.87. There was little or no co
rrelation between the rank order of the hospitals by risk-adjusted mor
bidity and risk-adjusted mortality. Conclusions: The Department of Vet
erans Affairs has successfully implemented a system for the prospectiv
e collection and comparative reporting of postoperative mortality and
morbidity rates after major noncardiac operations. Risk adjustment had
only a modest effect on the rank order of the hospitals. (C) 1997 by
the American College of Surgeons.