Studies on structural imagination show that imaginative thinking is gu
ided by conceptual knowledge structures. The two present studies explo
red the role of structured imagination in story creation. In Study 1,
it was predicted that variations in the representational knowledge of
abstract concepts would influence whether or not stories are meaningfu
l and original to readers. In addition, it was predicted that meaningf
ul and original stories would be more likely to express abstract conce
pts than nonmeaningful and nonoriginal stories. In Study 2, it was pre
dicted that stories evaluated as meaningful/original, meaningful/nonor
iginal, or nonmeaningful/nonoriginal would be related to the qualities
of meaning/nonmeaning and originality/nonoriginality of the image des
criptions used to write them. Chi-square analyses and percentage diffe
rences showed support for representational knowledge as an important i
nfluence on story meaning and originality, and that meaningful and ori
ginal stories were more likely to contain abstract concepts than nonme
aningful and nonoriginal stories, In addition, significant correlation
s were found between the creating of meaningful versus nonmeaningful s
tories and the: use of meaningful versus nonmeaningful knowledge pools
. However, significance was not Found far the originality/nonoriginali
ty dimension.