J. Lenhard et al., STRUCTURE AND FORMS OF ORGANIZATION OF THERAPEUTIC AND CLIENT-CARE INSTITUTIONS IN AGRICULTURE - AN EXPLORATORY-STUDY, Berichte uber Landwirtschaft, 75(3), 1997, pp. 459-485
In a manner similar to the care of cultivated landscapes, farms which
involve themselves in the care an therapy of social fringe groups also
play a role in our society. A survey of 167 farms was conducted in or
der to elucidate the preconditions for these activities. Social farms
are normally found under the heading of voluntary welfare work, and ar
e primarily financed either from public funds or by the sponsor of the
institution concerned, with the income from farming being dedicated t
o the farm itself. The survey revealed a vast diversity of production
plants and processes affecting both the use made of the land and lives
tock rearing. The degree of farm mechanisation is relatively low, and
stands in contrast to the high wages paid. More than 2/3 of the farms
were run on ecological principles of a variety of producers' organisat
ions. After private consumption in the farms and organisations themsel
ves, direct sales represent the most important way of disposing of pro
duce. One person looks after 2,6 clients on average and, in addition t
o providing a meaningful occupation, great stress is laid on the thera
peutic aspect of the work and on helping clients to come to terms with
life. Both the suitability for the social target function of the conc
ept of engaging clients in social farming, and the attitude of the cli
ents to this occupation, received good marks on the whole. Clients wer
e mainly employed in livestock rearing and labour-intensive plant prod
uction. The situation of social farms compared to ''normal'' farms is
characterised by their dual function. The social aspect is directly li
nked to an increased workload and the demands of the different goals o
f the farm: on the one hand to guarantee the profitability of producti
on, and on the other, to offer qualified client care. The income situa
tion is threatened by the general developments in agriculture, and by
the economy measures in public spending. Hence in the long term the co
mpensation for this social task should be improved.