Mj. Sparrow et al., A TRIAL OF 2 METHODS OF TAKING CERVICAL SMEARS - THE AYLESBURY SPATULA PLUS CYTOLOGY BRUSH COMPARED TO THE CERVEX BROOM, New Zealand medical journal, 110(1052), 1997, pp. 356-358
Aims. To compare the adequacy of cervical smear taking, using the Ayle
sbury spatula plus cytology brush with the Cervex broom. Methods. Two
cervical smears were taken at the same visit, the women acting as thei
r own controls. In Group 1 comprising 81 women, the first smear was ta
ken using the Cervex broom. In Group 2 comprising 97 women, the first
smear was taken using the Aylesbury spatula followed by the cytology b
rush. The tips of the samplers were sent to the laboratory in a cytolo
gy container with 30% ethyl alcohol in saline, for analysis of residua
l cells. Results. It took experienced staff two or three smears before
they were adept at taking an adequate Cervex broom sample as defined
by the presence of endocervical cells. Both techniques were equally go
od at detecting significant abnormalities. When the Cervex broom was u
sed first there were more smears with no blood present but when bleedi
ng occurred there was no significant difference between the two groups
. Both techniques were well accepted by the women. Conclusions. Althou
gh it is more expensive than the Aylesbury spatula and the cytology br
ush the Cervex broom has the advantage of allowing a simple one step p
rocedure, thereby reducing the potential for air drying.